Archive for ‘February 28th, 2013’

What we Learned from our first 50 Email Campaigns

By Jacob Aldridge

We just reached the 50 campaign / destination milestone! So, with some specific focus on our second month which has also recently ended, we thought we would expose our data … and share what we learned from those 50 campaigns.

Today’s Experience

If you’ve just found this article:

  • Why we are sharing all of this information with you? Because we love articles that open the kimono to other web businesses, and wanted to share our data and experience with those keen to learn from it.
  • This is Month 2, Part Two. Month 2, Part One (website traffic and revenue data) is here; Month 1 can be read from Part One or just Part Two.
  • EveryDaydream Holiday is a travel entertainment startup – We craft a travel story so real that it feels like your own endless vacation, and deliver it to your inbox five days a week.

Come here from Hacker News? This is a longform post – if you want to ensure there’s a useful HN discussion (like I do), consider upvoting this post now before it drops off the new page.


If it helps you to visualise our emails – which differ in design and content length from our daily posts – here are some examples:


My intention here is to first share the raw data, because I know some people find value in this (especially as a comparative exercise). The ‘So What?’ (and WIIFM) comes from our more in depth look at the data further down – click here to go directly there.

Four days into this month, my co-founder and I were having a text message discussion. At the time we noted after Month 1 we had added only 22 new subscribers – not even one a day. He was making a point about consistency – “We need to ask where do we get tomorrow’s subscriber from?”

I made the point that at 200 subscribers, you can statistically expect 1 unsubscribe every single time you send out an email*. Since we send a daily email (weekdays), finding 1 new subscriber each day would keep us steady, at best. My response was “We need to ask where are we getting 50 subscribers tomorrow?”

The next day, we had 55 people sign up.

Email Campaign List Growth Over Time

Cumulative Number of subscribers.

This graph shows our cumulative number of daily subscribers since we launched on 12/12/2012. You’ll see that the first month was one of steady, though uncertain, growth – we were generally moving upwards, with a particular spike around Christmas**. And then BANG on the 17th of January we meet my hypothetical 50 subscriber challenge.

The reason for this is detailed in Part 1 – it was our “200 Hours Effort” post going ‘viral’***. The impact of that on our site traffic and subscriber numbers lingered for about a fortnight – during which period we took our eyes off the ball a little. The last fortnight of the month, however, things trail off. That hurt – and we’re addressing that, so next month’s data will be rosier!

  • * This is based on some Vision 6 and MailChimp email marketing research, backed up by my own experience over 11 years of email marketing. An unsubscribe rate of 0.5% is about normal.
  • ** We’d like to say the Christmas spike was everyone spreading the word. In reality, it was mostly us seeing family.
  • *** I’m mindful that we’re sharing this data, not because we’re super massive and successful, but to help those who are also starting out. For us, 50 subscribers and 10,000 visitors in a day is ‘going viral’ – Buzzfeed probably sacks writers who hit numbers that low.


A reminder of the two Engagement Rates we use: “Open” and “Opened Click Through Rate”.

  • Open Rate is pretty straight-forward – what percentage of people who were sent the email, actually opened it.
  • Open CTR is the number of people who clicked through as a percentage of how many people OPENED the email.
  • This is slightly different to normal CTR, which measures click as a percentage of number sent, and therefore (in my opinion) lessens its utility.

Here’s how we trended this month against both measurements.

Email marketing Engagement Rates over time

Engagement Rates, Month 2 since Launch

And then here are two graphs comparing us to Travel and Transportation Industry Averages, provided by our email service provider MailChimp.

Email Campaign Open Rate Over Time

Open Rate, Month 2

Email Marketing Opened Click Through Rate Over Time

Opened Click Through Rate, Month 2

These comparisons are not perfect, of course – they lump our daily travel entertainment email in with weekly travel deal sites, hotel newsletters etc. It’s not apples v apples, but it’s what we have.

Our Open Rate, while declining, remains strong. In fact, the closest it went to approaching the average was our Kyoto email, which Gmail (and likely others) marked as spam – those days suck when you have a daily product – of course, you always have tomorrow.

Our Opened Click Through Rate, also declining, is not as successful. Our struggle here – and we experienced this last month – is finding the balance between providing a self-contained amazing daily email, and driving people to our site to read more. I’ve always believed that a content email ought to have value in and of itself – people don’t want to read emails they know will simply force them to visit a website. Our current email template design, amended to add more text, is part of the reason for declining numbers at the end of this month.

This made it less likely readers would click through to the website, but we believe (and must now test) that they will enjoy the email better as a result. If that’s the case, then Open Rates could be expected to improve as a result.

If you’re reading this as an email marketing expert, here’s a key takeaway.
  • Our normal CTR, when graphed, looks as more like our Open Rate graph than the other one.
  • If we just used that metric, we would be patting ourselves on the back. It’s misleading because it fails to filter out Open rate as a factor – more opens will equal more clicks-through. So while it’s a useful measurement for gross traffic numbers, it’s misleading and risky to use it as a measure of engagement.


Right, Raw Numbers are only useful if you want to put in the effort to compare. So here’s our ‘So What’ – we hope it also gives you some guidance for your email marketing efforts, with the caveat that you can never assume what is the case for one business will apply to another.


We wanted to know 3 things from our Unsubscribe data:

  1. What is our list churn?
  2. How long, on average, do readers stay before they unsubscribe?
  3. Is there a tipping point from the data that can help us avoid unsubscriptions?

1) What is our list churn?

This is a simple metric that asks ‘How long does it take for our list to replace itself?’ Some people will unsubcribe quickly (‘this isn’t what I expected’) and some people will never unsubscribe (thanks mum!), but on average how long would it take for our entire list to leave.

This is a simple calculation – we’ll do it just for month 2.

How many people left this month as a percentage of the remaining list.
(49 / 166 = 29.51%)

And then how many months would it take for that percentage to reach 100%?
(100% / 29.51% = 3.38)

Based on this data, our list will turn itself over every 3.38 months. That, incidentally, is awful for a business like ours! Our initial goal, not based on experience, was to make that figure 12 months* – we have a long way to go.

It’s also important to track that over time. In fact, if we do the analysis for our first 50 campaigns, the churn rate is 8.9 months. I won’t draw any conclusions until we have the data from more months.

Do you know your churn rate?

  • * Mailchimp notes that the average list loses 1/2 – 1/3 of their list each year – a churn rate of 12-18 months. HOWEVER, I note Newsletter Directory says the average account sends 42 campaigns per annum. 
  • If I combine those figures, we could deduce an average churn rate of 42-63 campaigns. We’re on track for ~180 campaigns, which shows either our content is really engaging or that the flaws in this comparison are gaping!

2) How long, on average, do readers stay before they unsubscribe?

This is also a simple calculation. I’m going to use a median for this, because over time I don’t want long term subscribers or confused subscribers who leave immediately to unduly impact the figure.

For EveryDaydream Holiday, the length of time in 13.5 days. (If we used the mean average, by the way, the figure would be 16.8 days. Again, let’s see how both those numbers move over time before drawing any conclusions.)

The wider data set here is kind of spiky, based largely on our small size at this point in time. (If our list size were 10x as large, 1-2 unsubscribers moving around wouldn’t affect things; here they create spikes and valleys.)

3) Is there a tipping point from the data that can help us avoid unsubscriptions?

I was hoping this data would show us something really interesting – like a lot of subscribers in the first X days, then a lull; or a significant spike after Y days that we might be able to prevent in some engaging way. But there’s nothing so dramatic in the data, based on where we’re at today.

Email Marketing Days on which people Unsubscribe

Days on which people Unsubscribe

Not being Nate Silver, I’m not going to draw many statistical inferences from this chart or the trendline in it. I will make two points:

  • There’s a clear trend downwards – this means that the longer people stay subscribed, the less likely they are to unsubscribe.
  • We’ve only had one subscriber stay with us for more than 6 weeks and then later leave.
  • Part of the reason for this is that we are a very young website.

You could draw the statistical inference here that if people are subscribed for more than 58 days they will NEVER leave. In reality, only 87 people (about half our current subscribers) have been with us for that long, and that data set is friends and family heavy.

I wanted to overlay on this the length of time current subscribers have been around. But that comparison proved to be unhelpful, because a majority of our readers came in two spikes – at launch (thanks to our pre-launch survey) and when our “200 Hours Effort” post went viral. Again, with time (and list growth) this will be useful.


List fatigue happens when subscribers “become bored with your email content“.

Engagement Rate over time since signing up

Engagement Rate over time since signing up

Here’s a graph of reader engagement BY DAY. That is, we normalise all of our subscribers back to Day 1 (the first email they receive) and then compare the daily averages. While it’s useful to know that ‘Toasting Marshmallows over Lava‘ is more engaging than ‘Going to Graceland‘ (which we can measure by the Engagement Rates, above), it’s also really valuable to test what happens to your subscribers over time. When, if ever, does List Fatigue kick in?

You can see an element of that in the trend line, and certainly the drop in open rates after the first week. Honestly, I was expecting to see a much more obvious trend, possibly with a plateau towards the end as we reached a consistent level of people happy to be receiving our daily email ‘forever’.

Instead, after the first week, there’s a fairly steady Open Rate band between 30% and 40%.

There are two major dips – at the very end (campaign #50) and at campaign #26. These are actually the same event, the campaigns just before I produced this data. Because we’ve had two dramatic spikes in subscribers, the current position of those cohorts (at 26 campaigns and 50 campaigns respectively) has an oversized impact on the numbers. As more subscribers move through, these will level out in a real number sense (ie, campaigns 26 and 50 won’t always look that bad); and we’ll always have to keep an eye on those cohorts, because where they are exactly on any day we produce this report will likely create a spike upwards or downwards.

One thing we’ve noticed – although anecdotally, unless we pull apart MailChimp to create that report as well – is how many people use the weekends to catch up on their readings. So our gross Open numbers normally go up over the following weekend – that’s part of the story here, with those dips caused by Wed / Thu / Fri emails awaiting a weekend. [Edit: All of those posts did see improvement over the weekend.]


Here’s a graph that shows what percentage of our subscribers open what percentage of their emails. (The X axis runs from 0%, never open, to 100%, always open our campaign; the Y axis shows the percentage of our subscriber base, including those who have unsubscribed, that match that open rate.)

Email Marketing Subscribers by Open Rate brackets

Subscribers by Open Rate brackets. X-axis is the Open Rate %; Y-axis is the % of subscribers in each bracket

I always expect 0% to be over-represented in these figures, because of the way email marketing software measures Opens. It’s possible for someone to open and read every email, and still never show on our reports.

At the other end of the spectrum, there’s another spike. Fully 6% of our subscribers open every single daily email; 14% open in excess of 90%.

That’s the email marketing game. Our overall Open Rates this month, for example, were sitting in the 30%-40% range. One-half to one-third of these are the same people every day – the remaining group varies by day, from people who open a few a week to the 25% of subscribers who open, on average, less than one per week.


I could play the email marketing data game all week, but there’s an amazing travel newsletter to publish. If you’d like to be part of this data in the future, you can subscribe to our free emails here.

And I would love to know – what other data would you like me to reveal, next time we open the kimono to EveryDaydream Holiday

Email me – – or leave a comment here or on Hacker News.

Going underneath the awesome power of Niagara Falls

We leave the hustle and pace and crowds of the Big Apple behind after three days in New York (Day One, Day Two, Day Three) for the comparative serenity of Toronto, on the east coast of that fair northern land – Canada.

But we’re not long in the city before Christine, our Toronto local guide, hustles us into her car and we’re out on the road.

Seems that New York isn’t the only town with hustle.

Today’s Itinerary

  • a lovely drive along Lake Ontario towards…
  • one of the world’s most well-known natural wonders – Niagara Falls
  • warm up afterwards with a Canadian national beverage
  • fit in a spot of bargain outlet shopping, then
  • sample some of the strangest wine in the world

The meandering drive from Toronto to Niagara Falls follows the curves of Lake Ontario as we leave the city. It’s mainly highways for the first part of the trip, but we are treated to views of the massive lake extended long out into the horizon in the morning sunlight.

Gradually the development begins to become less apparent and our expectations perk up. Niagara Falls, such a renowned natural wonder, is sure to be set in a location of spectacular natural beauty itself, showcasing the landscape and wildlife of southern Canada. Surely?

Not quite.

Natural Wonder + Casino

Niagara Falls is actually very heavily developed – to the point of absurdity, really.

We approach the falls from the Canadian side, which has the best view (no, really – it does – sorry USA) and instead of being gradually led through forests and mountainside to see the towering falls up gradually appearing in the distance behind sun-dappled trees, we just suddenly arrive smack bang in the middle of a miniature Las Vegas.

It feels a bit “oh yeah, there are some big waterfalls around here somewhere – but wouldn’t you rather play another hand of blackjack”.


We shouldn’t be surprised, though. According to the Niagara Parks agency, there was an admission fee to see the falls back in 1832. They say;

The first enclosed stairs were built in 1818, and a spiral staircase was constructed in 1832 for visitors to enter what was then called the “Sheet of Falling Water” attraction. The admission fee was $1, and for an additional dollar, certificates were presented to those who had completed the trip behind the Falls.

Being a tourist attraction is old hat for Niagara Falls.

Photo courtesy of

The pristine view that we were expecting at Niagara Falls. Photo courtesy of

We don’t have any photographs to share of the long line of casinos and massive hotels that line the upper banks along the Falls, because who wants to see that? Just prepare yourselves, is all we’re saying – if you’re expecting Niagara Falls to be remote and untouched, you’re going to be disappointed.

Now that is out of the way – we can talk about the Niagara Falls waterfalls.

One word – woah.

Photo courtesy of

Photo courtesy of

The sun is out and the wind is up a little, and everywhere around the falls there are miniature rainbows following you around.

If the world was just we’d be spotting pots of gold everywhere we looked, and little leprechauns would be carrying our things for us and calling us ‘Sir’, but the world isn’t just and this is Canada, not Ireland. No gold today.

Rainbows need water, by the way, and they’re caused by the sheer volume of water pouring over the edge of the falls and being picked up by the wind. It means that it is seriously wet around here – yes, even two hundred metres away from the falls. We would have been smart to bring an umbrella, or a waterproof jacket with us. This is definitely a sun shower – no clouds needed.

Photo by paul (dex) bica, Licensed under CC.

Photo by paul (dex) bica, Licensed under CC.

The archetypal Niagara Falls image, like the amazing photograph above, is found on the Canadian side of the border between Canada and the USA, close to the Horseshoe Falls. As we get close to the guard railings it is almost too hard to process the sheer power and volume of the water that must be rushing through the falls every second. The long curve of the Horseshoe gives an incredible perspective to the vivid green water contrasting against the pure white of the voluminous spray.

Christine turns to us and asks; want to get closer?

Not really, we think.

Behind the Niagara Falls

Somewhere in the vicinity of four milion cubic feet of water go over the falls every minute (we used Imperial because it sounds bigger; in Metric it’s around 100,000 cubic metres).

Christine grabs our tickets for the Journey Behind the Falls experience. We’re handed a (biodegradable) waterproof poncho and squash into an elevator that feels like it was part of the very first tourist attraction in Niagara Falls that we mentioned earlier.

We descend in the depths of the rock before the door creak open and we step out into tunnels built as far back as 1889. “They’re safe” we’re assured.

The noise, the roar from the falls is more than sound. You can feel the pressure and deep, low thrum generated by these elemental forces, and it is especially overawing as you get closer to the tunnel exit and begin to glimpse the tonnes of water rushing past at sixty-five kilometres an hour.

Photo courtesy of

Photo courtesy of

As you can see in the photograph, there are no real barriers to stop you from getting as close as you wish to the waterfall. Of course, most people, us including, are keeping a very, very respectful distance away from the edge of that ledge. We’re around one-third of the way down the waterfall but that is still a drop of 34 metres.

At the mouth of another tunnel exit, we head outside underneath a platform to get a better view of the waterfall, and are numbed by the relentless spray and the perspective that this view affords.

Photo courtesy of

Photo courtesy of

It is an awe-inspiring view. Cold; but awe-inspiring.

Warming back up

We’d be remise if we didn’t mention, at this point, one of Canada’s national drinks.

Tim Horton’s, the Canadian version of Starbucks crossed with Dunkin’ Donuts, is exactly what we need to warm up. The Vanilla Cappuccino goes down a treat…as does the second.

Finally some warmth returns to our extremities, and it’s time to move on to our next activity.

In the mood for a bargain?

The Canada One outlet stores near Niagara Falls are a must-visit if you’re looking to grab some bargains while you’re in Canada. We managed to pick up discounted Coach, Ralph Lauren Polo, Colorado, and Nike gear – so much that our poor little car complained the whole way back to Toronto.

It’s Cold in Canada, hey. Ice Wine, hey.

Christine drives us away from the commercialised, yet naturally compelling, Niagara Falls and promises a unique taste experience next.

We’re on the way to the Jackson-Triggs winery, in Niagara-on-the-Lake.

Canada is one of few nations in the world who can produce a type of wine known a ice-wine. The tradition originally comes from Germany, with whom Canada competes with for ice-wine supremacy. Of Canada’s annual production, most comes from Ontario, and the micro-climates of Niagara-on-the-Lake make this an ideal location to sample this unusual type of wine.

Photo by Graham, Licensed under CC.

Photo by Graham, Licensed under CC.

Invented by accident by those crazy Germans, the point is to leave the grapes on the vine through several frost-thaw cycles, and when pressing them, to aim for an optimal mix of thawed and semi-frozen grapes. Too cold, and you could break your winepress, as this NYTimes article describes.

Pressing the grapes while they are semi-frozen means that the water is crystallised and remains behind, leaving a concentrated cocktail of sugars to be put into the barrel.

Producing ice-wine is a risky business – there’s frost, disease, and calamity to contend with, but as the first golden drops is poured into our glass it becomes clear why this is a risk worth taking. The aroma is of caramel, vanilla, and apricots, and we debate whether there’s a hint of musk.

Better have another to check.